After more than three years of flip-flops, distortions, manipulations, gaslighting, outright lies and a constant full-court-press of coercion to get us to submit to untested, never-before-used-on-humans, completely untested experimental mRNA gene therapy injections, Anthony Fauci is exiting stage left with one final flip-flop…

His latest paper, which unsurprisingly is getting absolutely no mainstream attention should without a doubt let the air out of this ridiculous COVID VAX Hindenburg of a delusion/blow the wheels off this entire march forward of the vaccine/booster push and finally put an end to all the madness.

So why isn’t it?

The COVID narrative has been crumbling in real time for those with “eyes to see” with irrefutable evidence and data to support the free-thinking skeptics who have been punching holes in it since the onset of what will (hopefully) go down in history as the greatest PSYOP ever perpetrated on mankind.

Even the most devout COVID cultists are beginning to question certain aspects of the con. The current trend to “save face” appears to be some form of an “amnesty request”.

These superficial requests for amnesty are actually more like condescending and patronizing admissions to those they appear to hold resentment towards for not blindly and sheepishly falling in line as they themselves have.

They don’t actually credit the independent thinkers with reaching their own evidence/fact-based conclusions but rather talk down to them, resort to name-calling and call them “lucky” based on insulting character “flaws”. Names such as “conspiracy theorists” and “anti-vaxxers” are meant to marginalize those who by asking questions or pursuing a debate threaten their safe-haven “new normal”.

They claim that ending up on the “right side” was only the result of skepticism, mistrust of government and authority and pure dumb luck. What an insulting over-simplification!@#$%

No, it goes much deeper than that. Being skeptical is a powerful virtue. It not only enables but necessitates one to do their own research and cognitively disseminate information from various sources and points of view to reach one’s own conclusions.

Questioning and doubting the entire foundation of the COVID narrative is easy when one considers all the shenanigans involved in hyping up its threat. From the elementary ways in which hospital records and death certificates were manipulated to the pivot into cases, cases, cases based on fraudulent tests, it is really astounding how many people remain entranced by the whole spectacle.


The first mention of Amnesty came from Emily Oster in the Atlantic. The article is about as pathetically transparent as it is self-serving.

And then, I hadn’t been aware of Scott Adams’ celebrity status until being victimized by his insufferable Tweet, (I saw broken down so many times by the alternative media) giving credit to the “anti-vaxxers” who had been lucky enough to guess right. What a pompous and arrogant blowhard?!

Then came the condescending drivel via Newsweek from one Kevin Bass. In this piece of patronizing poppycock he addresses us from his self-appropriated pillar of the “Scientific Community” where he pats our heads for not quite understanding his comrades in those impressive government-funded scrubs and white lab coats. Basically, they didn’t explain things in simple enough terms that we, plebs could understand.

No, you have it all wrong there, Em, Scotto, and Kev. First off, there is a distinct difference between intelligence and smarts. Being intelligent enough to regurgitate long lists of regimented protocols drilled into you from textbooks by your heroes of academia does not necessarily make you smarter than everyone or anyone else.

Being taught by your parents to be aware of your surroundings and circumstances, to be alert and agile and ready and able to respond intuitively may in fact be immensely more valuable than merely being able to parrot affirmation and consent to popular conventions.

It was not due to mistrust, doubt and dumb luck but more of a healthy skepticism, cognitive thinking and problem-solving skills that we were able to avoid being herded into the pen of compliance.

In this day and age of CGI, virtual reality, botox-injected talking heads and deep-fakes, we were able to find real experts who bucked the status quo and stood for truth. Those brave enough to hold firmly to their convictions in the face of a steady blitzkrieg of character attacks and defamation to marginalize their actual expert opinions were in fact our sources of hope and light in this maelstrom of darkness and deceit.

It was not merely dumb luck but the discovery of real experts such as James Lyons-Weiler, Sucharit Bhakdi MD, Geert Vanden Bossche: DVM, PhD  and others who first pointed out the foibles of trying to vaccinate our way out of a coronavirus, aka: the common cold or flu.

James Lyons-Weiler warned us early on of the dangers of ADE-Antibody Dependent Enhancement based on  the 20-plus previous years of failure trying to sidestep the common cold or flu. (please see his video and more in this post)

Sucharit Bhakdi MD, a highly respected virologist advised that no injection could innoculate against a mucosal infection of a respiratory virus.

Geert Vanden Bossche: DVM, PhD , a most highly respected vaccinologist warned us that a “leaky vaccine” could lead to a more adaptive virulent virus.


So it was no accident of bumbling dumb luck that we were able to quite early on in this ruse able to see through the chicanery.



This brings us to the present phase of this skullduggerish operation. Fauci’s sleight of hand “admission” as he slithers away into the sunset and the next phase of his money-raking pontification tour.

This is where the two angles intersect. While we, free thinkers are being patronized by the “follow-the-science” dupes, the “emperor” is admitting that he was without clothes this entire time. Is this spewer of steaming excrement trying to make peace with his maker to avoid an eternity of hellfire or simply laying the groundwork for an eleventh-hour “I told you so” when the dam finally bursts?

Tony Fauci is now (in the paper linked below) admitting that there was no way (and he knew it) that in injection could provide immunity against a coronavirus that replicates predominantly in local mucosal tissue.

The experts mentioned above (and showcased in the videos below) had been warning us with real science despite aggressive censorship and the promulgation of pseudo-science.

This admission should be all that is necessary to take down the entire COVID vaccine narrative.

Why isn’t the dam bursting yet?

Why is the new “bivalent” shot being promoted?  The talking heads still mistakenly refer to it as a “booster” despite it being a completely new concoction- different from the original (and of course with no testing). The subsequent shots which were referred to as boosters were in fact more doses of the original? Go figure.

So with Fauci’s recent admission of their failure (that he knew all along) why ARE they still being promoted? Why are there still universities that require them of students?

Less than FLU: The Real COVID Fatality Rate-Dr. Ioannidis Peer Reviewed Study

Healthy young adults are in no danger from COVID and we know now the shots won’t prevent infection or transmission, so the “threat of killing granny” couldn’t possibly be eliminated.

Why the steadfast push?

Is Tony trying to “explain his mistakes” and ask for pandemic amnesty?

What is remarkable about that study is the derogatory language Fauci et al. employ towards influenza and Covid vaccines.

Until the emergence of COVID-19, influenza had for many decades been the deadliest vaccine-preventable viral respiratory disease, one for which only less than suboptimal vaccines are available.

Less than suboptimal vaccines is a term that leaves little to the imagination. Suboptimal means “not good.” Less than suboptimal means “useless at best.”

The article presumably discusses “next-generation vaccines.” However, the next-generation talk is empty and speculative, without specific mentions of any new technology that Dr. Fauci and his coauthors can recommend. The substance of the Cell article only explains why current influenza vaccines cannot prevent influenza and why Covid vaccines cannot prevent Covid.

Although current influenza vaccines reduce the risk of severe disease, hospitalization, and death to some degree, their effectiveness against clinically apparent infection is decidedly suboptimal, ranging from 14% to 60% over the past 15 influenza seasons.1 Furthermore, the duration of vaccine-elicited immunity is measured only in months. Current vaccines require annual re-vaccination with updated formulations that are frequently not precisely matched to circulating virus strains.8 Although annual influenza vaccinations are strongly recommended for most of the general public and especially for persons in high-risk groups, including the elderly, those with chronic diseases, and pregnant women, vaccine acceptance by the general public is not ideal.9

As of 2022, after more than 60 years of experience with influenza vaccines, very little improvement in vaccine prevention of infection has been noted.

The above sounds like this article by yours truly:

After retiring, Fauci does not mince words on Covid vaccines either:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the rapid development and deployment of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has saved innumerable lives and helped to achieve early partial pandemic control.

However, as variant SARS-CoV-2 strains have emerged, deficiencies in these vaccines reminiscent of influenza vaccines have become apparent. The vaccines for these two very different viruses have common characteristics: they elicit incomplete and short-lived protection against evolving virus variants that escape population immunity.

Fauci Knew Why Covid Vaccine Could Never Work

Fauci and his co-authors explain why Covid vaccine had no chance of working.

First, he asks a question that many vaccine skeptics brought up many times before:

This observation raises a question of fundamental importance: if natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not elicit complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfectionhow can we expect vaccinesespecially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines, to do so?

Then Tony goes on to explain why the respiratory nature of Sars-Cov-2 does not lead to even a possibility of encountering a bloodborne immune response.

In stark contrast, the non-systemic respiratory viruses such as influenza viruses, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV tend to have significantly shorter incubation periods (Table 1) and rapid courses of viral replication. They replicate predominantly in local mucosal tissue, without causing viremia, and do not significantly encounter the systemic immune system or the full force of adaptive immune responses, which take at least 5–7 days to mature, usually well after the peak of viral replication and onward transmission to others. SARS-CoV-2 “RNAemia” (circulation of viral RNA in the bloodstream, as is seen with most mucosal respiratory virus infections, as distinct from viremia, in which infectious viruses can be cultured from the blood), has been reported, and RT-PCR levels of viral RNA have been linked to severe disease,23,24 similar to studies of influenza RNAemia.25,26 As a result, the non-systemically replicating respiratory viruses, apparently including SARS-CoV-2,13,14,15 tend to repeatedly re-infect people over their lifetimes without ever eliciting complete and durable protection.

Regrettably, many of my unvaccinated readers report repeat infections with Covid-19. Even though I have had only one Covid so far, in Nov 2020, I am very cognizant that my natural immunity is far from perfect.

Another important factor to consider is that although RNA viruses share a similar inherent RNA-dependent RNA polymerase error rate,28 different viruses (and different open reading frames within their genomes) differ in their tolerance for mutation. Mutational constraints can be related to frequent overlapping open reading frames28 or functional constraints on the acquisition of nonsynonymous mutations as is the case, for example, with measles virus.29 In contrast, the external influenza A virus hemagglutinin and neuraminidase proteins are comparatively plastic, and positively selected nonsynonymous mutations result in immunologically significant antigenic drift,30,31 by the acquisition of nonsynonymous mutations in antigenic epitopes, as well as by altering the N-linked glycosylation patterns.32 Rapid antigenic drift affects the control of annual influenza epidemics8 and complicates the effort to produce broadly protective, “universal” influenza vaccines. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has shown a similar plasticity, with the emergence of multiple variants with altered antigenicity33 that has complicated its control through current vaccination strategies.34

Great, right? Fauci and his “science” are still injecting the original Wuhan strain-encoding mRNA, well into the fifth calendar year of the pandemic, while being fully aware that mutations have rendered those injections to be “less than suboptimal.” (the bivalent booster contains equal doses of Ba.5 and Wuhan variant-encoding mRNA)

Fauci Again Shows Knowledge of Immune Tolerance

Dr. Fauci shows great familiarity with “immune tolerance,” a condition affecting recipients of multiple mRNA vaccines:

The terms “disease tolerance” and “immune tolerance” refer to the still-incompletely characterized but distinct category of mammalian immune defense mechanisms that allow hosts to “accept” infection and other antigenic stimuli to optimize survival (reviewed in Medzhitov et al. and Iwasaki et al.). Because humans inhale and ingest enormous quantities of exogenous proteins with every breath and mouthful, the respiratory and gastrointestinal immune compartments have evolved to deal with continual and massive antigenic assaults from the outside world. (Immune responses to viral infection of the gastrointestinal mucosa have recently been reviewed, and are not discussed here.) Inhaled and ingested proteins must be identified and either tolerated or attacked and eliminated.

This is not the first time we caught Fauci being aware of immune tolerance and yet continuing to push tolerance-inducing mRNA Covid vaccines:

Fauci then speculates on what can be done to make a “new generation of vaccines.” His and his coauthors’ talk is very lame and exposes them as quacks who want to try out anything without a theoretical basis.

Appreciate the lack of any sense this passage makes:

For example, during times of significant viral circulation within human populations, can better protection be achieved with repeat dosing, or by sequential mucosal and systemic vaccination? Is frequent re-boosting a viable vaccine option, e.g., via self-administered home nasal vaccines? Also to be considered are possible ancillary roles for prophylactic antivirals, including “programmable antivirals” targeting conserved structures, antibodies, including therapeutic IgA and innate immunity stimulators as adjuncts to imperfect vaccines. It remains to be seen if vaccination and prophylaxis can be effectively combined at the population level.

It is disheartening that, during a man-made pandemic still taking hundreds of lives daily and still playing a role in excess mortality, we are led by people officially pushing for vaccines that they know to be “less than sub-optimal.”

Fauci Knew Covid Vaccine Would Never Stop the Pandemic

Fauci explained in the study cited above why a vaccine-induced blood (humoral) response to Sars-Cov-2 would never stop respiratory infections. And yet, he lied to us for THREE YEARS about how vaccines would be the key to “getting out of the pandemic” and getting to herd immunity.

Witness this video from 2020, where Fauci promises us herd immunity:

It is very regrettable that our health leaders, realizing that Covid vaccine could never possibly stop the Covid pandemic, preached to us that we could reach herd immunity.

As a result, we have a dumpster fire of a pandemic and excess mortality not even explainable by official Covid death counts.

Tony, meanwhile, is collecting hefty “speaking engagement” fees:

Will Dr. Fauci Admit “Mistakes” and Ask for Amnesty?

Why would Dr. Fauci lie to us about “herd immunity” when he knew, based on very basic properties of coronaviruses, that sterilizing immunity was impossible?

Is his article a clever way to prepare us for him asking for a “pandemic amnesty” and “recognizing his mistakes”?

How can we accept his actions as “mistakes” when he knew he was lying to us in furtherance of his goals? A mistake implies honesty, after all.

source: DailyClout

VIDEO: Ryan Cristián, The Last American Vagabond breaks it all down in depth with all the source material


The Real Anthony Fauci

Fauci Lies & How Fauci Fooled America

Fauci’s Net Worth Increased Over 70% to $12.7M Since The COVID “Pandemic”

Fauci-Moving The Goalposts….Again…..& Again….& Again….

The Narrative Crumbles-3 Ways Fauci Emails Expose Trail of Manipulation and Deception


VIDEO: panel discussion with Robert F Kennedy Jr. & Del Bigtree re: previous Mrna vaccine development








What Vaccine Trials?

Miracle Vaccine ~ Wait What? …Not So Fast

Will you still get jabbed after watching this?



Please share this, pass it along,
comment and start a conversation.



Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: